User talk:Icurite

Hello, another modest Kiwi pops in and starts working with no fanfare apart from a mention on the list of NZers!

And clearly into communications. Just out of interest, I looked at what the system says was your first contribution - Radio Pacific - and wondered why talkback isn't a live link. Bit of easy research for you there, I guess!

See you 'round. Best wishes. - Robin Patterson 13:34, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Wow! Thanks for the welcome! Radio Pacific wasn't my first contribution - see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&hideminor=0&target=Icurite&limit=500&offset=0. I am really trying to concentrate on having at least a useful stub for each New Zealand radio station. I've also been enjoying Simple English. - Icurite 22:42, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

stub tags, format

Hi Icurite

Welcome to Wikipedia :-).

A request: please use the {{stub}} tag to indicate a stub. Also, the first mention of the article's name in the text is usually marked up in bold ('''bold''').

Thanks and keep up the good work! --Ianb 07:14, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I will try to remember next time and I will try to fix up the many articles in which I made that mistake when I have the time. Thanks for the reminder. Icurite 10:15, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand

Hi, You might want to consider adding {{User NZ res}} to the top of your user page, which will add you to this category automatically and also add a nice graphic. Onco_p53 07:43, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I took your advice. i c u r i t e

Stuckism Wales

I have put the information from Stuckism Wales into the Stuckism article here, as per merge tage, so it is currently effectively redundant, unless there is enough information to make an article like Stuckism in Australia.

Tyrenius 10:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will create redirect. i c u r i t e

Auckland meetup

Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland for more details), and that you are cordially invited. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hamilton suburb stubs

Just a quick heads-up about the naming conventions used for New Zealand places.

If they're unique in the world, it's just "Name", like Te Anau.
If they're unique in new Zealand, it's "Name, New Zealand", like Miramar, New Zealand.
If theyre's more than one in NZ, it's "Name, Province", like Hillcrest, Waikato - these also usually get a disambiguation page at "Name, New Zealand".

A couple of the new ones you made have been moved from "X, Waikato" to "X, New Zealand". It's just to help non-NZ users of Wikipedia, who might know somewhere's in New Zealand but not whereabouts it is. BTW, there's also a specific geography stub template for New Zealand {{NZ-geo-stub}}. Grutness...wha? 02:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the help. i c u r i t e

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have identified yourself as an Anglican, and so I thought that you may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lifefm.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lifefm.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Meyer

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wendy Meyer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Wendy Meyer. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 01:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Icurite! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 2 of the articles that you created are currently tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Andrew Saville - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tim Dower - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Dower

Hi, I doubt you're still watching this, but I just wanted to let you know that I've proposed the article Tim Dower for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article explains why. More boilerplate details follow...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Avenue (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Open Site for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open Site, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Site (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naylor, New Zealand

The article Naylor, New Zealand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, unencyclopedic, and a search shows no evidence that Naylor as a suburb exists in Hamilton

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]